About Blocktivity
Tracking blockchain activity since 2017 — because the number that matters is how much each chain is actually used.
Eight years of honest data
Blocktivity launched in 2017 with a simple question: of all these blockchains promising to change the world, which ones do people actually use? Not by market cap. Not by developer activity or social buzz. By the one metric that cannot be faked at scale: on-chain transactions.
Over eight years the site has tracked tens of chains, millions of data points, and some of the most dramatic rises and falls in the industry — all by sticking to that one honest signal.
The relaunch you are reading right now is the biggest rebuild since 2017. Same mission, cleaner foundations: Transactions as the headline metric (Operations was an imperfect proxy), a visible data-status trust layer, and a focus on making every number legible and accountable.
The manifesto
"Embrace decentralization. Heal the world."
The blockchain industry has a noise problem. Every chain that launches claims to be the fastest, most scalable, most decentralised, most whatever. Most of these claims are marketing. Most of the numbers attached to them are meaningless or unverifiable.
Transactions are different. A transaction is a user doing something on-chain — sending value, executing a contract, making a record. You can count them. You can compare them across chains. You cannot fake sustained transaction volume at scale without real users or real economic activity.
Blocktivity exists to answer the question that all the hype obscures: which blockchains are people actually building on, transacting on, relying on, right now? Not which ones have the biggest fundraise, the loudest Twitter account, or the most venture capital. The ones with real users.
This matters because capital and attention are finite. When people can see which chains are genuinely used, they can make better decisions — developers choosing where to build, investors deciding where to allocate, foundations understanding their real standing in the ecosystem. Honest data is a public good.
We are not neutral. We believe that blockchains which provide real utility to real users are better than blockchains that exist mainly to generate token price. We believe that disclosure is better than opacity. We believe that a scoreboard that makes fabricated activity visible — and labels it clearly — does more for the ecosystem than one that pretends not to notice.
That is why every number on this site carries a source label. That is why we have a data-status system with nine distinct levels. That is why we have a credibility gate. Transparency is not a feature — it is the product.
Who runs it
Blocktivity is an independent project run by a single operator. It is not backed by any blockchain foundation, venture fund, or industry association. There is no editorial board, no token, no DAO.
This independence is the point. A ranking site funded by the chains it ranks is not a ranking site — it is marketing. Blocktivity's only revenue is sponsorship, which buys a labelled highlight in the table, never a rank position.
For enquiries, partnerships, sponsorship, or to report a data issue, use the contact form.
Data principles
Transactions are the metric, and the only one
Tx is the most universal cross-chain metric. Operation counts vary wildly in definition from one chain to the next, so we no longer collect or display them at all.
Every number carries a source and a confidence label
The data-status system has nine levels from Official API to Archived. Colour is paired with a text label — colour is never the only signal.
We do not sell rank
Sponsors get a visible highlight. Their rank in the table is determined by their actual transaction data.
Chains own their data
Each chain provides a stable API endpoint. Blocktivity fetches it hourly, publishes what it returns, and labels any divergence or failure transparently.
Disclosure over mandate
We do not force a single transaction definition. We require that every chain discloses its definition so visitors can interpret the number correctly.
See Methodology for the full technical spec (data statuses, staleness, formulas), API docs to list your chain, or Contact to reach us directly.